Saturday, May 24, 2025

County council shares rail freight concerns

A detailed new report has shown the wide-ranging concerns Leicestershire County Council has with the proposed Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange (HNRFI).

Responding with a written representation as a statutory consultee on the proposal, the county council’s report states that it cannot support the application due to the lack of information provided by the applicant.

HNRFI is planned on land to the east of Hinckley with access from M69 Junction 2. Plans submitted by Tritax Symmetry have been assessed by the county council, who found significant gaps, including:

  • Only 21 of 45 junctions needing detailed assessments by the applicant having been carried out
  • No detailed assessment of impact on M1 J21/M69 J3
  • No detailed analysis of the impact of the development on Sapcote village
  • Significant impact on public rights of way and lack of proposals for new walking and cycling routes
  • Overexaggerated carbon benefits of the scheme

With the scale of the development increasing demand on the surrounding road network, Tritax have failed to properly address or plan for appropriate access infrastructure on numerous elements of the scheme, according to the council.

Concerns in relation to economic information and carbon emissions have also been highlighted, including inconsistencies over employment claims for the development and the additional emissions being brought to Leicestershire that have failed to be mitigated against.

Councillor Ozzy O’Shea, cabinet member for highways and transport, said: “It’s plain to see that the highways information provided by Tritax is nowhere near enough for us to support this proposal. Information is lacking and where it is provided, some is inconsistent.

“I hope this reassures residents who will be most impacted by this development that our representation to the Planning Inspectorate makes it clear the information supporting the proposals falls way short of what we’d expect to see.

“Rail freight interchanges do have benefits and another in Leicestershire would be welcomed, but it has to be right for the county and our road network, and from what we can see this location just isn’t suitable.”

Due to the scale of the development, the final decision will be made by the Secretary of State for Transport.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our news site - please take a moment to read this important message:

As you know, our aim is to bring you, the reader, an editorially led news site and magazine but journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them.

With the Covid-19 pandemic having a major impact on our industry as a whole, the advertising revenues we normally receive, which helps us cover the cost of our journalists and this website, have been drastically affected.

As such we need your help. If you can support our news sites/magazines with either a small donation of even £1, or a subscription to our magazine, which costs just £33.60 per year, (inc p&P and mailed direct to your door) your generosity will help us weather the storm and continue in our quest to deliver quality journalism.

As a subscriber, you will have unlimited access to our web site and magazine. You'll also be offered VIP invitations to our events, preferential rates to all our awards and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Just click here to subscribe and in the meantime may I wish you the very best.









Latest news

Related news

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close